Anna
Havinga
University of Bristol
Non-Dominant varieties and invisible languages: the case of 18th- and early 19th-century Austrian German
Keywords: Austrian German, 18th and early 19th century, invisibility, historical sociolinguistics
The study of non-dominant varieties poses a particular challenge to historical linguists as often only dominant varieties
were used in writing. Consequently, there is very few direct historical
evidence, i.e. texts, for non-dominant varieties: they remain literally
invisible to both contemporary readers and modern historians (cf. Havinga &
Langer 2015). In order to provide an account of the fullness of actual language
use at a particular time in the past, historical sociolinguists have identified
a number of methods and sources to obtain a picture of language use and
language perception which takes account of non-dominant varieties (see Langer
2012). In my doctoral research, I focus on the case of Austrian German as a
stigmatised variety in the eighteenth century. Austrian German can certainly be described as being
‘invisible’ in formal writing from the late 18th century onwards,
especially after Empress Maria Theresa (1740-1780) propagated the use of the
Upper Saxon language norms while dismissing Austrian German features as
‘incorrect’. This active process of stigmatization, which prevented particular
Austrian German features from being written down, can be referred to as
‘invisibilisation’.
In
this paper, I will focus on 18th- and early 19th-century
Austrian German morphology and lexis to explain the concept of ‘invisible
languages’ clearly and address the following questions:
References:
Havinga, Anna & Langer, Nils (eds.). (in print). Invisible Languages in the 19th
century. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Langer, Nils. 2012. ‘Finding non-dominant languages in the
nineteenth century – problems and potentials from historical sociolinguistics.’
In: Rudolf Muhr (ed.). Non-dominant
varieties of pluricentric languages. Getting the picture. Oxford: Peter
Lang. 83-107.